Background: Burn assessment traditionally relies on visual inspection and 2D estimation, which introduces substantial variability in determining wound size and healing progression. Three-dimensional (3D) surface scanning offers a more objective alternative, yet the clinical utility of area-based metrics obtained from 3D surface data remains insufficiently defined. This pilot study aimed to evaluate structured-light 3D scanning for objective longitudinal quantification of the burn wound surface area and a description of area-based healing dynamics derived from repeated measurements. Methods: Eighteen patients with 43 acute thermal burns underwent serial structured-light scanning, followed by manual segmentation of wound regions and the calculation of absolute and percentage area reduction as well as TBSA-normalized metrics. Longitudinal monitoring was performed by comparing sequential 3D surface models acquired at defined clinical follow-ups, enabling the calculation of absolute area change (ΔA), percentage reduction, daily healing rate, and ΔTBSA%. Results: Baseline wound areas ranged from 7.27 to 2137.98 cm2. Percentage area reduction ranged from 5.25% to 92.30%. The overall reduction in burn burden (ΔTBSA) ranged from 0.07% to 12.94%. Large wounds tended to show rapid absolute area reduction (>100–300 cm2/day) during early follow-up, while small superficial burns frequently achieved >80% reduction within 10–15 days. Conclusions: These findings suggest that 3D surface scanning may support the objective longitudinal assessment of burn wound healing. This pilot provides a basis for future studies evaluating additional topographic parameters and broader clinical applications.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bibiána Ondrejová
Katarína Dudová
Monika Michalíková
European Burn Journal
Technical University of Košice
Ocná klinika
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ondrejová et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69acc56732b0ef16a404f94a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj7010015