Open EEG and MEG repositories now contain thousands of hours of neural recordings across diverse tasks, subjects, and acquisition systems. However, large-scale comparative analysis and model-based inference remain difficult due to heterogeneous data formats, bespoke preprocessing pipelines, inconsistent metadata, and non-standardised feature definitions. These limitations impede reproducibility and restrict cumulative evaluation of theoretical and applied claims about neural dynamics, arousal, cognition, and behaviour. This paper specifies the architecture of Eidon: Neural State Manifold and Modelling System, a unified, declaratively configurable EEG/MEG analysis and modelling framework designed to produce comparable feature assets and modelling artefacts across heterogeneous sources. The framework is designed to: (i) harmonise heterogeneous EEG/MEG inputs via a shared internal schema; (ii) apply fully parameterised preprocessing; (iii) compute a spatially referenced, cross-domain electrophysiological feature stack spanning spectral and cross-frequency measures, aperiodic (1/f) components, time-domain and ERP features, state-dynamics and complexity measures, ICA-derived features, connectivity matrices, and graph/network metrics; (iv) align neural features with behavioural and subject-level variables; and (v) support model-agnostic comparative modelling by enabling multiple model families to be fit and evaluated on shared, standardised neural and behavioural feature representations. Supported model families include classical statistical models, machine-learning approaches, probabilistic generative models, dynamical systems models, network and graph-based models, and quantum-inspired cognitive models, with optional extension modules available for additional specialised model classes where justified by a given use case. All stages are governed by a single configuration file specifying data sources, parameters, feature sets, model families, evaluation schemes, export targets, and optional run-level execution controls, enabling reproducibility, auditability, and transparent provenance. The paper has two aims. First, it specifies the system design, rationale, and module interfaces for an end-to-end automated EEG/MEG pipeline whose specification is defined independently of any particular implementation. Second, it defines the configuration semantics, output schemas, and provenance guarantees required to support reproducible cross-dataset feature extraction and comparative modelling across heterogeneous EEG/MEG sources.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Angela Harper Gow
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Angela Harper Gow (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ad1387e7e9681137aa9560 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18894058
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: