ABSTRACT China targets carbon peak by 2030 and neutrality by 2060. Catalytic CO 2 hydrogenation to methanol using renewable H 2 is a promising route for carbon recycling and emission reduction. However, developing efficient catalysts is hindered by complex structure–performance relationships. This study addresses this by constructing a dataset (112 samples and 28 features: composition, processing, and properties) and applying machine learning to predict Cu‐based catalyst performance. Six models—random forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, gradient boosting, SVR, and DNN—were compared for predicting CO 2 conversion, CH 3 OH selectivity, and yield. Optimal models varied as follows: SVR best predicted CO 2 conversion (test R 2 = 0.245), XGBoost excelled for CH 3 OH selectivity (test R 2 = 0.922 and MSE = 46.508), whereas CH 3 OH yield prediction was poor (LightGBM best and R 2 = 0.006). SHAP analysis revealed key nonlinear feature contributions (e.g., Cu content, GHSV, and temperature). Focusing on CH 3 OH selectivity, XGBoost was optimized as follows: multialgorithm voting and stepwise elimination identified 12 key features (e.g., Zn salt type, In content, and drying time). Bayesian hyperparameter tuning boosted performance (test R 2 = 0.9352). SHAP provided interpretability and design guidance. Bootstrap resampling validated reliability (95% CIs). An online prediction platform enhanced screening efficiency. Despite strong test performance, cross‐validation R 2 (0.7473) indicates a need for larger datasets. This work provides a robust data‐driven framework for optimizing CO 2 ‐to‐methanol catalysts, demonstrating ML's potential in catalysis research.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Conglong Su
Zhangkai Jing
Qiuming Zhou
Sinopec (China)
Tsinghua University
State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering
Sinopec (China)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Su et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69af94e870916d39fea4c01e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cbh2.70046