Many dynamical systems evolve within domains whose structural limits are not determined by their internal dynamics. This paper introduces a geometric framework for analyzing such limits in state space by defining an admissible structural domain S, its boundary S, and a structural distance function dS () measuring proximity to collapse. Drawing a formal analogy with Gödel's incompleteness theorems, we prove that the structural boundary of a system represents a non-derivable condition: it cannot, in general, be derived solely from the internal vector field governing the system's evolution. This result is interpreted within the Theory of Axiomatic Necessity (TNA), which posits that operational systems require external structural 'axioms' to define their domain of validity. The formulation provides a quantitative representation of systemic rupture, suggesting that collapse is not a dynamical failure but a logical consequence of reaching the non-derivable limits of a system’s internal structure.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Claudio Bresciano
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Claudio Bresciano (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3abe702a1e69014ccd2ea — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18969453