Digital literacy is central to student success in technology-mediated higher education, particularly in resource-constrained environments. This study introduces the Digital Literacy Course for Learning Management Systems (DLC4LMS), an equity-sensitive instructional design framework that synthesises the ASSURE model, Universal Design for Learning (UDL), Community of Inquiry (CoI), EquityXDesign, and Laurillard’s Conversational Framework. Guided by Design Science Research (DSR), the study followed three iterative cycles: (1) relevance, identifying digital literacy gaps among first-year students; (2) design and development, constructing the DLC4LMS framework through theoretical integration and stakeholder input; and (3) rigour and evaluation, formatively validating the framework with academic staff at two South African universities. Findings suggest the importance of embedding equity as a design driver, integrating mobile-first tools, and linking digital literacy to both academic survival and employability. The DLC4LMS extends existing instructional design models, traditionally developed in well-resourced contexts. By adapting them for low-bandwidth, mobile-only, and equity-challenged universities. While developed in South Africa, its principles are transferable to similar Global South and humanitarian education settings. This research contributes a theoretically grounded, context-responsive model that advances inclusive digital transformation in higher education.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Khulekani Yakobi
Godwin Kaisara
Tabisa Mayisela
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Frontiers in Education
University of Cape Town
Durban University of Technology
Namibia University of Science and Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yakobi et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4faf0b39f7826a300b995 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1744029
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: