What question did this study set out to answer?

To compare outcomes of kidney transplants preserved by static cold storage followed by hypothermic machine perfusion versus static cold storage alone.

March 14, 2026Open Access

Hypothermic Machine Perfusion Allows Safe Delay in Kidney Transplantation After Cold Storage

Key Points

To compare outcomes of kidney transplants preserved by static cold storage followed by hypothermic machine perfusion versus static cold storage alone.
Single-center retrospective study of 200 adult recipients of kidney transplants from brain-dead donors
Outcomes included primary graft non-function, delayed graft function, graft survival, and renal function over 24 months
Multivariable analysis and propensity score matching were employed to adjust for baseline imbalances.
In the SCS+HMP group, delayed graft function occurred less frequently (17.6% vs. 39.2%; p = 0.027)
Primary graft non-function rates were similar between the two groups (3.9% in SCS+HMP vs. 5.9% in SCS; p = 1.0)
Patient survival and graft survival were comparable at 24 months.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Static cold storage (SCS) remains the standard method of kidney preservation. As a referral transplant center, we frequently receive kidneys initially preserved with SCS and subsequently initiate prolonged hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) to extend allocation time and optimize recipient matching. The clinical impact of this sequential preservation strategy remains incompletely defined. To compare outcomes between kidneys preserved with SCS followed by prolonged HMP (SCS+HMP) and SCS alone. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 200 adult recipients of kidney transplants from brain-dead donors (67 SCS+HMP; 133 SCS). Outcomes were primary graft non-function (PNF), delayed graft function (DGF), patient and death-censored graft survival, and renal function over 24 months. Univariable and multivariable analyses identified predictors of DGF. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for baseline imbalances. Results: In the SCS+HMP group, grafts underwent a median of 244 min of SCS followed by 1300 min of HMP, resulting in longer total cold ischemia time than SCS alone (1545 vs. 1104 min; p < 0.001). After matching, 51 pairs (n = 102) were analyzed. In the matched cohort, PNF occurred in 2 patients (3.9%) in the SCS+HMP group and 3 patients (5.9%) in the SCS group (p = 1.0). DGF occurred less frequently in the SCS+HMP group than in the SCS group (17.6% vs. 39.2%; p = 0.027). In multivariable Firth penalized logistic regression, HMP was independently associated with lower odds of DGF (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.13–0.82). During the 24-month follow-up, patient survival, death-censored graft survival, and creatinine trajectories were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Sequential HMP after initial SCS enables extended preservation and was associated with a lower incidence of delayed graft function. This strategy does not compromise patient survival, death-censored graft survival, or renal function at 24 months.

Read Full Paperexternally

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper