Active learning has increasingly been adopted as an evidence-aligned approach to improving learning quality in university physics—a domain characterized by high conceptual abstraction, persistent misconceptions, and substantial variability in student performance. Evidence from physics education research indicates that active-learning designs can outperform lecture-dominant instruction in conceptual learning and student engagement; however, reported effects vary substantially across instructional settings and implementation models. Here, empirical studies and review-level syntheses are integrated to delineate (i) the instructional components that most reliably underpin successful active learning, (ii) the mechanisms through which these components influence learning processes and outcomes, and (iii) the boundary conditions that moderate effectiveness across higher-education contexts. The synthesis is further situated within sustainability-oriented higher education by linking physics active-learning designs to competence development relevant to quality education, climate literacy, and collaborative problem solving. Evidence spanning flipped classroom implementations, peer instruction, collaborative problem solving, inquiry- and project-based approaches, and technology-enhanced formats is organized into a component–mechanism–outcome framework structured along cognitive, affective, and behavioral pathways. Two deliverables are advanced: an integrative mechanism model connecting instructional components to mediating processes, learning outcomes, and sustainability-aligned competencies, and an operational toolbox that translates the evidence into actionable design heuristics, measurement options, and scaling considerations. By redirecting attention from “which strategy works” to “which components work, how, and under what conditions,” the review aims to support instructors, departments, and institutions seeking scalable, evidence-aligned active learning in university physics.
Xiao et al. (Thu,) studied this question.