Digital literacy programmes have been implemented to empower marginalized groups in rural areas. However, there is a lack of empirical research specifically examining gendered digital literacy programmes and their impact on decision-making power among women in Nigerian rural markets. The study employs a randomized controlled trial (RCT) approach, where participants in Nigerian rural markets were randomly assigned to either receive the digital literacy programme or serve as controls. Data collection includes pre- and post-programme surveys assessing digital skills, self-efficacy, and decision-making power. A preliminary analysis suggests that women who participated in the gendered digital literacy programme demonstrated a statistically significant increase (p <. 05) of 20% in their decision-making power over control participants. This highlights the potential for tailored programmes to empower rural female populations. The experimental design reveals promising insights into how gender-specific digital literacy programmes can be effectively implemented and evaluated, providing a robust framework for future research and policy development. Future studies should expand on this methodology by incorporating longitudinal data collection to assess long-term impacts of the programmes. Additionally, it is recommended that further investigation explore which specific components of digital literacy are most effective for enhancing decision-making in rural contexts. Digital Literacy, Gendered Programmes, Experimental Design, Empowerment, Decision-Making Power Model estimation used =argmin_ᵢ (yᵢ, f_ (xᵢ) ) +₂², with performance evaluated using out-of-sample error.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chinedu Obioma
Osita Chikere
Nwachukwu Nnamdi
University of Ibadan
University of Nigeria
Ladoke Akintola University of Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Obioma et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fbd5b39f7826a300c4b9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18990072
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: