Heat treatment critically controls microstructure and mechanical properties in engineering alloys, but experimental optimization is costly and time-intensive. Machine learning (ML) offers a data-driven alternative, though data scarcity and feature leakage often limit predictive reliability. A comprehensive ML framework was developed and validated using a physics-informed synthetic dataset of 332 heat-treated alloy samples covering carbon steels (AISI 4140, 1080, 4340, 5130), aluminum alloys (AlSi7Mg, AlSi10Mg, Al6061, Al2618), and stainless steels (304, 316L). Twenty-seven features describing chemical composition, heat-treatment parameters, and microstructural characteristics were initially included. Following strict data-leakage analysis, all six mechanical property features were fully removed, leaving 22 independent predictors. Five regression models—Extra Trees, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Ridge, and ElasticNet—were evaluated using a 70/15/15 train–validation–test split with randomized hyperparameter optimization and 3-fold cross-validation. The Random Forest model showed the best test performance for tensile strength prediction (R2 = 0.9282, RMSE = 37.24 MPa, MAE = 28.54 MPa, MAPE = 5.39%), with minimal overfitting. Tempering temperature, carbon content, and manganese content were the most influential features, aligning with established metallurgical principles. The proposed framework demonstrates robust, leakage-free prediction of mechanical properties from composition and processing parameters, offering a scalable approach for accelerated alloy design pending experimental validation. This study serves as a methodological framework demonstration; the reported performance metrics are benchmarks against the synthetic dataset, and experimental validation with real alloy data remains essential for industrial deployment.
Tiwari et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: