Can aspects of predatory publishing be applied to some mainstream and grey journals?

Key Points

• This research explores how predatory publishing aspects could apply to mainstream and grey journals.
• Analyzes editorial and production practices across various journals.
• Comparative study of existing quality indicators for journals.
• Examines authors' experiences in the publishing process.
• Identifies gaps in available editorial and production practice data.
• Stresses the importance of sharing quality indicators for all journals.
• Suggests that research funders could require compliance with quality indicators for funding.