Drone warfare introduces a profound transformation in the relationship between combatants, technology, and the battlefield. Unlike conventional forms of warfare, drone operations allow military personnel to conduct surveillance and lethal strikes from locations far removed from the physical theatre of conflict. This article examines how the increasing reliance on unmanned aerial systems contributes to the dehumanisation of warfare, altering both the psychological experience of operators and the ethical frameworks governing the use of force. Drawing on interdisciplinary literature in security studies, philosophy, and international humanitarian law, the article explores how remote warfare reshapes moral responsibility, risk distribution, and perceptions of violence. Particular attention is given to the implications of persistent aerial surveillance and the mediation of combat through screens and digital interfaces. The analysis argues that drone warfare creates asymmetrical conditions in which one side experiences combat as remote technological management while the other confronts an unseen and impersonal adversary. T hese dynamics raise significant challenges for existing ethical and legal frameworks regulating armed conflict, particularly in contexts where attribution, accountability, and civilian protection remain difficult to ensure.
Johan G.L. Verheyden (Sun,) studied this question.