Purpose of review Despite significant progress in evidence-based therapies and models of care, hepatology continues to face challenges in translating proven interventions into routine clinical practice. Variability in adoption has contributed to ongoing gaps in quality, outcomes, and equity of care across diverse settings. Implementation science offers a systematic approach to understanding and improving how evidence-based interventions are delivered, adapted, and sustained in real-world environments. This review provides an overview of implementation science and discusses its increasing importance for advancing hepatology research and practice. Recent findings Recent studies in hepatology have applied implementation science frameworks to better understand why effective interventions fail to reach patients and how those barriers can be addressed. Work in areas such as viral hepatitis elimination, cirrhosis management, palliative care integration, hepatocellular cancer surveillance, and alcohol use disorder treatment illustrates the value of focusing on context, stakeholder engagement, and strategy selection. These studies commonly use established frameworks, pragmatic trial designs, and mixed methods to assess outcomes such as adoption, fidelity, and sustainability alongside clinical impact. Summary Implementation science offers a practical bridge between discovery and routine care in hepatology. Integrating implementation principles into research, quality improvement initiatives, and trainee education can accelerate the translation of evidence into practice, reduce unwarranted variation in care, and promote more equitable delivery of liver-related services.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Manisha Verma
Hamza Tahir
Richard Kalman
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Verma et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb9336496e729e62981286 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/mog.0000000000001164