The urgency of decarbonization has generated increasing interest in using mission-oriented innovation policies to achieve net-zero emissions. An energy transformation, however, requires managing a much more complex portfolio of supply- and demand-side initiatives than traditional, “linear” missions. “Transformative” innovation policy thus poses a formidable administrative and political challenge, particularly for large, federal, liberal market economies. Leveraging variation in state capacity within the US, we find that the Department of Defense is better positioned to pursue transformative, green innovation policies than the Department of Energy, despite the latter’s central position in national decarbonization efforts. Specifically, the Department of Defense’s scale and scope enable it to coordinate across a wide array of policy instruments, actors, and priorities. Whereas efforts to endow the Department of Energy with similar capacities sparked a backlash, the Department of Defense’s bipartisan mandate to confront geotech challenges and its ability to leverage secrecy have insulated it from political interference. In illustrating how one large, liberal polity has succeeded (and struggled) in pursuing decarbonization, we highlight the distinct administrative and political capabilities which underpin transformative innovation policy, the tension between them, and one strategy to soften this tradeoff.
Apitz et al. (Thu,) studied this question.