This paper develops the consciousness gradient framework: an integration-based account developed through a dual-aspect interpretation of physically instantiated processing, on which consciousness and qualia are identical and differ only by depth of qualitative integration. Minimal qualia are treated as minimal consciousness, while macro-awareness arises when qualitative states become highly integrated across memory, modality, and bodily registration. Intelligence is not built into the definition of consciousness; instead, the paper advances the empirical hypothesis that flexible adaptation to structurally novel situations emerges only once integration reaches sufficient depth. The paper presents four axioms and five explicit predictions, including a pre-committed benchmark, the Relational Reversal Task, designed to test whether current AI systems can achieve structurally out-of-distribution adaptation without experiential autonomy. It also addresses the simulation objection, the combination problem, active inference, evolutionary epiphenomenalism, biological naturalism, and the strongest objections from AI scaling. The central claim is intentionally risky: if parametrically determined systems solve the relevant class of tasks without physically instantiated, history-bearing, structurally plastic synthesis, the framework is wrong. The paper is therefore offered not as settled theory, but as a narrow, falsifiable proposal about the relationship among consciousness, individuality, and intelligence. Note: This paper was developed through an iterative process involving the author and AI language models (Claude by Anthropic, Gemini by Google and GPT by OpenAI). The foundational thesis, core arguments, axioms, and all theoretical commitments originated with the author. The AI tools contributed literature review, formal drafting, structural organization, and adversarial review. The author takes full responsibility for all claims presented.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Joe Curlee
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Joe Curlee (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69be37506e48c4981c676ddf — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19120731