This study explores the professionalization of the rising design engineering discipline, called 'biodesign'. Despite its potential for circular, regenerative solutions, its industrial application remains limited. To address this challenge, this study investigates 'why' and 'how' professional designers engage in designing of, with and for biology. The study explores the motivations and practices of professional biodesign pioneers through extensive expert interviews (n=21). A qualitative analysis applying the QUAGOL methodology identified five key codes: biodesign mindset, -process, -resources, -materials, and -future. These aspects were further investigated through their five most cited sub-codes, offering evidence-based findings into current biodesign practice. Synthesising these findings, a novel methodological biodesign framework is proposed, that maps nested environments (operating space-biodesign space-biosphere space) and an iterative systemic cybernetical loop between human and more-than-human agencies. The framework offers a structured point of departure for biodesign professionalization and supports future empirical validation and tool development for professional practice and education.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bert Vuylsteke
Louise Dumon
Jan Detand
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
University College West Flanders
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Vuylsteke et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69bf86ecf665edcd009e9015 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ae54ef
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: