Algorithmic bias has become a major ethical concern as AI systems increasingly shape decisions in hiring, healthcare, finance, criminal justice and social media. This study examines the causes and impacts of such bias by demonstrating how unfair outcomes arise from biased data, design choices and existing social inequalities. Through a qualitative review of interdisciplinary literature and real case studies- including discriminatory hiring tools, inaccurate facial recognition and unequal credit scoring- the study shows that algorithmic bias reflects broader structural issues. Findings reveal that current fairness techniques, fairness metrics and transparency measures remain limited. Stronger governance that includes explainability standards, inclusive data practices, regulatory oversight and participatory design is needed. The study concludes that achieving fairness in AI requires shared responsibility among developers, policymakers and communities. Without proper accountability AI may reinforce inequality but with ethical governance it can support justice, trust and equitable decision-making. Additionally, this study emphasizes the importance of continuous evaluation and monitoring of AI systems throughout their lifecycle to prevent the re-emergence of bias after deployment. It highlights that fairness should be integrated as a core design principle rather than treated as an afterthought. By addressing algorithmic bias proactively, AI systems can be made more reliable, socially responsible, and aligned with human values. The findings of this research contribute to the ongoing discussion on ethical AI development and provide a foundation for future work aimed at creating fair, transparent, and trustworthy AI systems.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sayyed Insha Sufi
Misbah Momin
Suzugamine Women's College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sufi et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69be38906e48c4981c67905a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18218025