This study set out to determine whether an artificial-intelligence-driven personalized curriculum can raise mathematics and English achievement among visually-impaired junior-secondary learners in low-resource public schools in Imo State, Nigeria. The prevailing problem is that static Braille textbooks arrive late and impose uniform pacing, thereby widening achievement gaps. Seventy-two learners with best-corrected visual acuity of 6/60 or worse and no additional intellectual disability were recruited from three special schools representing urban, peri-urban and rural zones. Using a mixed-methods quasi-experimental design, participants were randomly assigned to the VI-AI group (n = 36) or the Braille-control group (n = 36). Over twelve weeks the VI-AI group studied on low-cost Android tablets that adapted difficulty, provided speech/haptic feedback and exported content to braille displays, while the control group followed identical objectives through conventional Braille textbooks. Pre-, post- and delayed tests were supported by usability and self-efficacy scales plus semi-structured interviews. ANCOVA revealed a large post-test advantage for the VI-AI group (d = 0.81, p < .001) and a medium retention effect four weeks later (d = 0.48). Usability exceeded the acceptability threshold (78.3/100) and digital self-efficacy rose by 0.9 scale points (d = 1.05). Qualitative themes linked the gains to learner autonomy but also highlighted power outages as a threat to retention. The findings indicate that AI-driven personalization can significantly enhance academic performance and perceived inclusion of visually-impaired learners, provided that scale-up is accompanied by stable power, targeted teacher professional development and open-source adaptive engines.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dr, Ogbu, Eke Eke
Ogechi Nkemjika
Obiageli lbebuike Dr Ursula
Federal University of Technology Owerri
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Eke et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69bf3924c7b3c90b18b43471 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19126680
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: