Recent arguments in favor of Presentism leverage Markovianity, the principle of the future’s events being able to be determined/influenced only by current events (and sufficiently near events). These approaches, however, leave the room open for objections centered around recent speculative non-Markovian foundations of our physical theories. Using insights from Builes and Impagnatiello’s argument and drawing on recent quantum foundations, I explore how non-Markovian quantum dynamics may constrain metaphysical accounts of time. I compare rough versions of Eternalism and Presentism in their ability to accommodate temporally extended correlations and motivate further development with explicit treatment of non-Markovian physics in the metaphysics of time.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hong Joo Ryoo
Philosophies
Johns Hopkins University
Johns Hopkins Medicine
University of Baltimore
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hong Joo Ryoo (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37b33b34aaaeb1a67d608 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11020045
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: