This preprint delivers the first systematic, cross-modal empirical demonstration that Liquid State Machines (LSMs) operating at the commonly assumed neuromorphic scale of **N = 256** units exhibit a hard functional capacity floor: they are incapable of outperforming simple temporal baselines across biologically realistic sensory modalities. Using a rigorous dual-baseline protocol — (BL1) single-frame random projection and (BL5) 5-frame mean-pooling — we evaluated un-tuned LSMs (non-linear leaky integrators, τₘ = 15 ms, spectral radius α ∈ 0. 50, 0. 99) on three independent, modality-specific benchmarks under controlled noise regimes (0. 0–0. 30): • **V1 Visual** – frame-by-frame 2D Gabor classification • **A1 Auditory** – theta-gamma nested sequence discrimination • **S1 Haptic** – continuous beta-band force trajectory regression Across 5 identically-seeded macroscopic trials per condition, the N = 256 reservoir produced **zero statistically significant performance gain** over the naive temporal mean-pooling baseline (gap ≤ 0 everywhere, p > 0. 10). While qualitative α preferences differed by task (stable α ≈ 0. 60 for smooth regression; higher chaos for categorical tasks), the quantitative echo-state capacity was universally exhausted — the reservoir could not preserve more distinguishable temporal trajectories than a simple moving average. **Core Conclusion: ** Near-critical reservoir advantages do not emerge unconditionally below a structural scale threshold. We establish an **empirical minimum specification of N ≥ 1024** for any spatial topology relying on reservoir mechanics in neuromorphic or continuous-time implementations. **Relation to Prior Work** This capacity-floor result supplies the critical scaling invariant required to justify the liquid-dynamics substrate employed throughout the RDLNN architecture. It directly constrains the reservoir dimensions used in the multi-module system presented in: **Biologically-Constrained Modular Active Inference: A Functional Architecture from Trace to Gating** and is mechanistically enabled by the module-specific β-parameterisation proven necessary in: **Dual-Component Eligibility Traces: Structural Necessity of β-Parameterisation in Modular Neuromorphic Systems** All three works instantiate core components of the unified neural substrate previously released as: **NeuroForge: A Unified Neural Substrate for Scalable Biological AI** (https: //doi. org/10. 5281/zenodo. 17622945) **This paper forms part of a series. The integrated architecture paper "Biologically-Constrained Modular Active Inference: A Functional Architecture from Trace to Gating (RDLNN v1. 0) " is available at https: //doi. org/10. 5281/zenodo. 19186955 **This paper forms part of a series. The "Dual-Component Eligibility Traces: Structural Necessity of β-Parameterisation in Modular Neuromorphic Systems" at https: //doi. org/10. 5281/zenodo. 19189919 **Additional Notes for Zenodo: ** • Preprint (March 2026) – fully reproducible with dual-baseline protocol, seeded trials, noise sweeps, and statistical reporting. • Figure 1 (A1 accuracy curves showing LSM ≤ BL5 across all α and noise levels) included in the PDF. • Provides the grounded architectural floor specification for reservoir layers in any biologically-constrained neuromorphic blueprint. This work closes a critical gap between theoretical reservoir universality and practical neuromorphic deployment by proving that macroscopic dimension scaling is not optional but a hard prerequisite for liquid-state computational advantage.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Anol Deb Sharma
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Anol Deb Sharma (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37b33b34aaaeb1a67d6f8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19190611