β-arrestin 1 and 2 adopted distinct conformations across subcellular locations in response to agonists, directing location-biased signaling of the AT1R and promoting ERK activation.
The study reveals that β-arrestins adopt location-specific conformations that direct distinct ERK signaling profiles, highlighting their nuanced roles beyond traditional G protein pathways.
β-Arrestins are multifunctional, intracellular proteins that regulate the desensitization, internalization, and signaling of more than 800 G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) and interact with a diverse array of intracellular partners. Beyond the plasma membrane, GPCRs can initiate distinct signaling cascades from various subcellular locations, a phenomenon known as “location bias.” Here, we investigated how β-arrestins directed location-biased signaling of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) conformational biosensors and extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK) activity reporters. We found that, in response to the endogenous agonist angiotensin II and the β-arrestin–biased agonist TRV023, β-arrestin 1 and β-arrestin 2 adopted distinct conformations across different subcellular locations, which were associated with different ERK activation profiles. We also uncovered a population of receptor-free, activated β-arrestins in the plasma membrane that exhibited insensitivity to different agonists and promoted ERK activation at the plasma membrane independently of G proteins. These findings deepen our understanding of GPCR signaling complexity and highlight the nuanced roles of β-arrestins beyond traditional G protein pathways.
Pham et al. (Tue,) conducted a other in GPCR signaling. Angiotensin II and TRV023 was evaluated on β-arrestin conformation and ERK activation profiles. β-arrestin 1 and 2 adopted distinct conformations across subcellular locations in response to agonists, directing location-biased signaling of the AT1R and promoting ERK activation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: