Abstract This article examines the intertwined political rationalities of “Islamism prevention” and democracy promotion in state-led programs in Germany. Drawing on critical scholarship on prevention, democracy promotion, and securitization, the article pursues two interrelated arguments. First, it shows that the politics of distinction between “Islam” and “Islamism” is not merely epistemological but constitutes a governing tool. Such distinctions racialize Muslim minorities by measuring them against unmarked standards of “proper” religion. Second, the article argues that democracy promotion programs tied to preventive rationalities depoliticize democracy by framing it as a stable order to be upheld instead of as a contested political project. This displaces deeper exclusions embedded in the modern nation-state and its racialized borders into individualized ideals like resilience, tolerance, or civic virtue.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Schirin Amir-Moazami
Democratic Theory
Freie Universität Berlin
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Schirin Amir-Moazami (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4cdcdfdc3bde44891a842 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s2332889426000229
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: