We present a statistical analysis of the 175 SPARC galactic rotation curves to test the hypothesis of whether the Keplerian velocity tapering at large radii ( V ( r ) ∝ 1 / r ) germane to a convergent mass distribution in typical spherical halo models agrees with observational data. The null hypothesis is Rubin’s flat-rotation curve, V ( r ) = constant -such as can be obtained from a spherical, isothermal-like density profile, or alternatively with a very prolate halo-. To decide whether we adopt the null (Rubin behaviour) or alternative (Keplerian behaviour) hypothesis, we evaluate the derivative in each galaxy of V ( r ) with its last data points. The test is model independent inasmuch we are testing for the slope of the dark matter rotation curve, whether it is or not compatible with zero. We conclude that the data is presently compatible with the null hypothesis -no taper off, no decline of V ( r ) is seen. Separately, beyond SPARC, our own Milky Way galaxy, for which recent data sets have been reported, does show clear V ( r ) fall-off at the level of 20%. • We analyze the SPARC galactic rotation curve database. • We find that, at the largest distance SPARC covers, matter rotates with constant velocity, statistically speaking. • This constant velocity remains as reported by Rubin, Ford and others, and does not confirm the prediction of NFW-type models that the velocity should taper off. • Recent data from the Milky Way show the opposite behaviour, suggesting the need for better data for other galaxies to try to clear the issue.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
A. Bariego-Quintana
Felipe J. Llanes-Estrada
New Astronomy
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Instituto de Física Corpuscular
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bariego-Quintana et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69c770418bbfbc51511e06df — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newast.2026.102537
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: