Background/Objectives: Sex analysis in dental radiographs plays a central role in forensic identification, especially when biological material is compromised or incomplete. While most AI-based studies rely on complete dentition or craniofacial structures, this study investigates whether sex-based information can be extracted solely through segmentation of third molars in panoramic radiographs. Methods: A retrospective dataset containing 2818 third molar annotations from 757 panoramic images with balanced class distribution across training, validation, and testing subsets was constructed. Three sample segmentation-based deep learning models—YOLOv12n, YOLO26n, and RT-DETR v2—were evaluated under the same training conditions using detection-focused metrics including sensitivity, recall, and mAP. Results: YOLOv12n demonstrated the most balanced performance, achieving the highest mAP@0.50 score of 0.810 and mAP@0.50–0.95 score of 0.574; RT-DETR v2 showed higher sensitivity but lower localization accuracy and significantly longer training time. YOLO26n yielded the highest recall rate but showed an increase in false positives. Class-based analyses indicated sex-specific morphological variability in third molar anatomy, showing consistently higher detection performance in female samples. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that isolated third molars encode distinctive sex-related signals and that segmentation-focused frameworks offer an interpretable and clinically relevant alternative to whole-image classification in forensic dentistry. Future studies should incorporate larger multi-population datasets, multi-tooth integration, and explainable AI techniques to further improve robustness and applicability.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ayşe BULUT
Melis Büşra Aşkın
Gökalp Çınarer
Diagnostics
Bozok Universitesi
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
BULUT et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69c6209315a0a509bde19246 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16070977
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: