There is no doubt that the Federal Supreme Court in Iraq constitutes its constitutional judiciary, and it assumes many of the powers stipulated in the Constitution of the Republic of Iraq in 2005, including oversight of the constitutionality of laws. However, this power is not absolute, but rather is in accordance with constitutional and legal rules, as the Federal Court is subject to It is supreme over many constitutional restrictions in its oversight of the constitutionality of laws. When this court monitors the constitutionality of laws, the constitution must be rigid and enjoy supremacy over the rest of the laws in the state in order for there to be a benefit to this oversight, because there is no meaning to oversight without the rigidity and supremacy of the constitution because it is amended just as the law is amended. ordinary, Therefore, this oversight is carried out by the Federal Supreme Court through a constitutional lawsuit filed before it by someone with a direct interest in the case. This court examines the constitutionality of the laws in accordance with the constitutional and legal procedures and restrictions, especially since its decisions are final and binding on all authorities in the state. Therefore, the constitutional restrictions and oversight must be stated. On the constitutionality of laws and the extent to which there are justifications for these restrictions, in addition to explaining their types.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wadeea Dakheel Ibrahim
University of Anbar
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wadeea Dakheel Ibrahim (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69c620ab15a0a509bde193fe — DOI: https://doi.org/10.63677/jqlap.2024.183552
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: