Abstract Aim: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) remain a major public health concern among adolescents and young adults. Persistent knowledge gaps and misconceptions among university students highlight the need for feasible, learner-centered educational approaches. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a medical student–led, peer-supported STI education session on university students’ STI knowledge. Materials and Methods: A quasi-experimental pretest–posttest study was conducted within a Special Study Module at Faculty of Medicine. The intervention consisted of a single, in-person, interactive session delivered by trained medical students under faculty supervision. STI knowledge was assessed immediately before and after the session using a validated 25-item instrument. Pretest–posttest matching was performed via anonymous self-generated codes. Total score changes were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and item-level changes in correct responses were examined with exact McNemar tests. Results: Twenty-nine participants with matched pretest and posttest data were included. Mean knowledge scores increased from 10.24 ± 5.17 to 17.79 ± 4.27 after the intervention (Z = −4.319, p 0.001). Item-level analyses demonstrated significant improvements in key domains, including HIV–STI co-risk, hepatitis B transmission risk, HPV-related cancer risk, treatment availability for gonorrhea and chlamydia, and correction of common misconceptions (exact McNemar p-values 0.05 for multiple items). Conclusion: A single-session, medical student–led peer-supported educational intervention was associated with a substantial improvement in university students’ STI knowledge. This pragmatic model may represent a scalable approach for strengthening sexual health literacy in university settings.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nurbanu SEZAK
Aysel Baser
Journal of Contemporary Medicine
İzmir Demokrasi Üniversitesi
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
SEZAK et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69c771348bbfbc51511e10ac — DOI: https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1882320