For Gilles Deleuze and Jacques Rancière, representation is a crucial intersection between aesthetic and political concerns. Examining this nexus reveals the conditions necessary for minorities to gain visibility and voice in the collective public sphere. The ongoing crisis of democracy today raises fundamental questions about the relationship between democracy and representation: Is democracy a system in which all voices are accounted for? Does the election of autocratic leaders indicate an anti-democratic shift, or does it, in fact, express a radical dissensus that is intrinsic to democracy itself? Juxtaposing the perspectives of Deleuze and Rancière, I offer a critical examination of the limits of representation – not merely as a procedural mechanism of exclusion and inclusion, but as a philosophical framework with far-reaching political implications.
Keren Shahar (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: