This paper presents a fuzzy satisfaction-based intelligent framework for early-stage multiobjective sizing of a buck DC–DC converter under uncertain operating conditions. Lightweight closed-form estimators are used to evaluate inductor current ripple, output voltage ripple, and efficiency, including an explicit decomposition of ripple into capacitive and ESR-induced components to distinguish capacitance-dominated and ESR-dominated regimes. Engineering targets for ripple, efficiency, and passive size/cost pressure are mapped to reproducible piecewise membership functions and aggregated into a bounded overall satisfaction score using a weighted geometric operator; alternative non-compensatory and OWA-type aggregators are considered for sensitivity analysis. The resulting nonconvex design problem is solved via a compact two-stage derivative-free strategy that combines global screening with an interpretable Takagi–Sugeno (TSK) rule-based refinement layer, which generates bounded, physics-consistent updates of the design variables and supports rapid feasibility restoration followed by preference-driven tuning. Uncertainty in operating conditions and parameter drift is addressed through scenario evaluation and worst-case or average-case aggregation of satisfaction, linking the fuzzy decision objective to robust scenario design. Numerical studies for a 24 ± 4 V to 12 V converter illustrate regime-dependent adaptation: in low-ESR conditions, ripple improvement is driven mainly by capacitance/frequency adjustments, while in high-ESR conditions, the rule base shifts corrections toward inductor and frequency choices that reduce ESR-dominated ripple.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nikolay Hinov
Technical University of Sofia
Reni Kabakchieva
Technical University of Sofia
Plamen Stanchev
Technical University of Sofia
Mathematics
Technical University of Sofia
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hinov et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69c772058bbfbc51511e22f0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math14071115
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: