Bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) deconvolution typically uses single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) references, but some cells are only detectable through single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq). Because snRNA-seq captures nuclear, not cytoplasmic, transcripts, its direct use as a reference could reduce deconvolution accuracy. We benchmarked integration strategies across four tissues, comparing principal component (PC)-based latent shifts, conditional and non-conditional scVI (single cell variational inference), and cross-modality differentially expressed gene (DEG) filtering. All approaches improved over raw snRNA-seq, but pruning cross-modality DEGs produced the largest gains, often matching or exceeding scRNA-only references. Conditional scVI performed comparably and was effective when matched scRNA-snRNA cell types were unavailable. In real adipose bulk samples, DEG pruning and conditional scVI provided the most robust cell-fraction estimates across donors and transformations. These results demonstrate that scRNA-seq should be prioritized as a reference when available, and we recommend appending snRNA-seq only after removing cross-modality DEGs; when DEG information is limited, conditional scVI is a practical alternative.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Adriana Ivich
Casey S. Greene
Cell Reports Methods
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ivich et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ca1280883daed6ee094ea8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmeth.2026.101346