In patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid intervention, GDF-15 demonstrated the highest prognostic accuracy for 1-year mortality (AUC 0.795; 95% CI 0.675-0.915; p<0.001), outperforming NT-proBNP.
Cohort (n=100)
No
Do systemic biomarkers (GDF-15, suPAR) combined with right atrial pressure improve 1-year mortality risk stratification in patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid intervention?
100 consecutive patients with symptomatic severe tricuspid regurgitation despite guideline-directed medical therapy undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention. Mean age 80.7 ± 6.7 years, 48% male. Single-center cohort in Germany with high comorbidity burden.
Preprocedural biomarker assessment (GDF-15, suPAR, H-FABP, sST2, NT-proBNP) and right atrial (RA) pressure measurement prior to transcatheter tricuspid intervention (transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, heterotopic caval valve implantation, or orthotopic replacement).
1-year all-cause mortalityhard clinical
In patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid intervention, systemic biomarkers like GDF-15 and suPAR outperform NT-proBNP for predicting 1-year mortality, especially when combined with right atrial pressure.
Effect estimate: AUC 0.795 (95% CI 0.675-0.915)
p-value: p=< 0.001
Background:Transcatheter tricuspid interventions for severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) are increasingly used, yet many patients present at an advanced stage when clinical benefit is limited.The conventional biomarker NT-proBNP often fails to reflect systemic organ injury or right-sided hemodynamics.We hypothesized that systemic biomarkers combined with invasive haemodynamic data improve risk stratification for 1-year mortality after transcatheter TR intervention. Methods:In this prospective single-center cohort, preprocedural blood samples for biomarker assessment (GDF-15, suPAR, H-FABP, sST2, NT-proBNP) and right atrial (RA) pressure were obtained in patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid repair or valve implantation.Incremental prognostic value was assessed by adding RA pressure to biomarker-based models.Predictive performance for 1-year allcause mortality was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analyses.Optimal cut-offs were derived by Youden's index, and survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing. Results:Among 100 patients (mean age 80.7 6.7 years, 48% male), 22 (22%) died within 1 year.The cohort showed advanced disease and a high comorbidity burden.GDF-15 demonstrated the highest prognostic accuracy (AUC 0.795, 95% CI 0.675-0.915;p < 0.001), followed by suPAR (AUC 0.746, 95% CI 0.626-0.866;p < 0.001).NT-proBNP did not significantly predict mortality.Combining J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f GDF-15 with RA pressure improved discrimination (AUC 0.805).Elevated GDF-15 or suPAR was associated with significantly reduced survival. Conclusion:In patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid intervention, GDF-15 and suPAR outperform NT-proBNP for predicting 1-year mortality.Integration of RA pressure further refines risk stratification and may aid patient selection and timing of intervention.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Christoph Edlinger
University of Salzburg
Johannes Schlegl
Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane
Marwin Bannehr
Structural Heart Disease
CJC Open
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
University of Salzburg
Paracelsus Medical University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Edlinger et al. (Sun,) conducted a cohort in Severe tricuspid regurgitation (n=100). GDF-15 and suPAR combined with right atrial pressure vs. NT-proBNP was evaluated on 1-year all-cause mortality (AUC 0.795, 95% CI 0.675-0.915, p=< 0.001). In patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid intervention, GDF-15 demonstrated the highest prognostic accuracy for 1-year mortality (AUC 0.795; 95% CI 0.675-0.915; p<0.001), outperforming NT-proBNP.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c28cde0f0f753b39cf21 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2026.03.006