PURPOSE BRAF V600 mutations are tumor-agnostic oncogenic drivers whose targeted inhibition is challenged by therapeutic resistance. Mosperafenib is a novel paradox breaker and brain-penetrant BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi), tested in this study for safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary clinical activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS This phase Ia/b study was conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring a BRAF V600 mutation (ISRCTN13713551). The modified continuous reassessment method guided dose escalation of mosperafenib, which was given orally up to 3,600 mg once daily in 28-day cycles. The primary objective was to estimate the MTD and/or recommended phase II dose(s). RESULTS Eighty patients (60% BRAFi-exposed)—63 with colorectal cancer (CRC), 13 with melanoma, and 4 with other solid tumors—received ≥1 dose of mosperafenib as a single agent for a median of 3.7 months (range, 0.2-28.6). Two dose-limiting grade 3 toxicities of rash and rash maculopapular were reported. MTD was not reached. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 13 patients (16.3%); no grade 5 TRAEs events were reported. Two patients (2.5%) discontinued study treatment due to TRAEs. There were no reports of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia or keratoacanthoma. Linear and time-independent PK was demonstrated across the tested dose range, achieving exposure levels with sustained PK-derived pERK inhibition ≥90%. An exposure-response relationship was observed. Overall response rate was 24.2%, including two complete responses and 14 partial responses. Median progression-free survival was 6.4 months in patients with CRC (200 mg once daily-1200 mg three times a day) and 3.5 months in patients with melanoma (200 mg once daily-800 mg twice a day). CONCLUSION Mosperafenib demonstrated a favorable safety profile, sustained target inhibition, and early signs of clinically meaningful single-agent activity in BRAFi-naïve and BRAFi-exposed patients.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
María Vieito
E. Fontana
Catherine Han
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Imperial College London
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Hammersmith Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Vieito et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c2fcde0f0f753b39d8cb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-25-02444
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: