Dark energy, responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe, is one of the greatest mysteries in modern cosmology. The standard \ (\) CDM model treats it as a cosmological constant, but this leaves the “cosmological constant problem” unresolved and predicts a constant equation of state that may be in tension with observations. This paper develops an interpretation within Energy-Efficiency Theory (EET). Starting from **Yang’s Axioms** 1, we propose that dark energy is not a constant but the cosmic-scale gradient of free-state energy—the spatial inhomogeneity of the vacuum’s lowest-energy background. As the universe expands, the free-state background is stretched, creating a gradient that acts as a repulsive gravitational source. We derive the Friedmann equations from EET principles, showing how the free-state gradient generates acceleration, and connect to the observed distance-redshift relation. The framework quantitatively recovers the Hubble constant \ (H₀ = 71. 51. 2\) km/s/Mpc, the CMB power spectrum, and the BAO scale, resolving the Hubble tension. We provide a rigorous proof of the dark energy–matter coupling from energy-momentum conservation, with coupling strength \ (g = 1. 210^-3\). Testable predictions include a specific redshift-dependent equation of state \ (w (z) = -1 + (1+z) \) with \ (0. 1\), a novel scaling law for the free-state energy fraction, and a distinct evolution of the acceleration rate. We extend the framework to extreme regimes: early universe, high-redshift quasars, and the ultimate fate of the cosmos. The framework is fully compatible with general relativity at large scales while providing a first-principles ontology for dark energy.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hongpu Yang
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hongpu Yang (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c324de0f0f753b39db3d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19253974
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: