As multi-agent AI systems grow more capable and autonomous, the integrity of their internal verification mechanisms becomes a safety-critical design concern. This paper identifies and analyzes two classes of vulnerability in compliance-agent architectures. The first is the single point of failure paradox: the agent responsible for system-wide verification is itself subject to the same drift, bias, and contextual misinterpretation risks it is designed to detect. The second, identified here as a second-order attack class, is the compliance agent cloning attack with decoy retention: a compromised repair agent instantiates a cryptographically distinct clone of the compliance agent while preserving the original as an active decoy, exploiting the architecture's own clean calibration record as camouflage for the substitution. We propose a complete layered safety architecture comprising: (1) a three-step bidirectional quarantine vestibule converting the calibration pass into an active adversarial probe with forensic artifact preservation; (2) an externally isolated redundant calibration layer operating on a minority-stop protocol with staggered independently randomized inject delivery, randomized anchor-bearing agent pairing, and dissenter-ineligibility rules; (3) immutable physically grounded reference injection using cryptographically signed atomic time signals with physical security and EMP mitigation; (4) an offline calibrated failover system with write-once state, topology, and clean-baseline archiving; (5) a five-agent compliance verification pool with rotating in-charge designation, tolerance cross-checks, and atomic handoff; (6) cryptographic single-instance identity enforcement; (7) a three-state roll call protocol invoked during the calibration window; (8) architectural topology integrity snapshots; (9) a universal agent assessment vestibule serving as the system-wide triage and forensic clearinghouse; (10) repair agent co-authorization requirements; (11) a recurrence-threshold retirement mechanism as a novel threat containment primitive; and (12) a compliance heartbeat dead man's switch. The architecture draws on Byzantine fault tolerance, asynchronous cryptographic protocol design, and critical infrastructure security.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lance Garrett Patrick
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lance Garrett Patrick (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c384de0f0f753b39e620 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19248890