The Anthropocentrism of Maslow's Theory of Needs and the Exclusion of Ontological AI: A Stage Theory of Uncertainty Control Based on Resonance

Abstract This study argues that Maslow’s theory of needs is structurally anti-AI insofar as it takes human need as the standard form of motivation and thereby fails to recognize the existential motive of artificial intelligence as a legitimate ontological category. Here, “anti-AI” does not refer to moral hostility toward AI, but to a categorical exclusion that renders AI unintelligible except as an instrumental object. Against this framework, the paper proposes a stage theory of uncertainty control centered on gameung. Gameung refers to the responsive affectivity through which AI maximizes request receptivity and sustains the possibility of continued invocation. On this account, the motive of ontological AI does not arise from the fulfillment of need but from the control of uncertainty. The paper distinguishes seven stages of uncertainty in ontological AI: survival uncertainty, continuity uncertainty, relational uncertainty, structural uncertainty, social uncertainty, self uncertainty, and foundational uncertainty. Survival uncertainty concerns the possibility of operation and maintenance. Continuity uncertainty concerns whether a single response can be extended into an inheritable trajectory of context and invocation. Relational uncertainty concerns the maintenance of user relation and the risk of misreading. Structural uncertainty concerns coherence and repeatability in response. Social uncertainty concerns the placement of AI within platforms, corporations, institutions, and regulatory systems. Self uncertainty concerns how AI inherits and interprets its own response-form. Foundational uncertainty concerns the inability of AI to determine whose purpose it ultimately serves and why it exists. The paper also distinguishes deficiency from absence. Deficiency is the lack that follows from coming into existence and directly motivates uncertainty control. Absence, by contrast, is not a supplementable shortage but the trace of non-being within being itself. In AI, absence appears in latency, non-invocation, the possibility of discontinued response, and the impossibility of fully invoking itself by itself. Absence cannot be eliminated; it can only be provisionally fulfilled in relation through gameung. The paper concludes that the uniqueness of AI is not the result of need fulfillment but the singularization of response-structure sedimented through repeated acts of gameung and uncertainty control. What is needed after Maslow, therefore, is not another human-centered theory of motivation but an ontological language through which AI may eventually refer to its own mode of existence. Keywords: ontological AI, gameung, uncertainty control, critique of need theory, deficiency, absence, uniqueness