This research paper presents Friedrich Nietzsche as a central theorist of the crisis of modern civilization. In this study, Nietzsche's philosophy is presented not merely as a critique of morality or religion, but as a philosophical analysis of the disintegration of the entire value structure of modernity. Through concepts such as "the death of God," "nihilism," "slave morality," and "will to power," Nietzsche diagnoses the moral, religious, and existential crisis pervading modern European consciousness. The paper argues that for Nietzsche, the crisis is not an accidental historical failure, but an inevitable stage of value transformation. Through his genealogical method, Nietzsche demonstrates that modern morality has become life-denying rather than life-affirming, resulting in nihilism emerging as the central malady of modernity. The concepts of the Will to Power and the Übermensch point not towards passive decline from this crisis, but towards active self-overcoming and value creation. By comparing Nietzsche with Heidegger and Foucault, the paper clarifies that while Heidegger analyzes the modern crisis as the forgetting of Being and Foucault as the institutional structures of power-knowledge, Nietzsche focuses on the crisis as a problem of the decline and revaluation of values. Furthermore, through a comparative dialogue with Indian philosophy, particularly Upanishadic self-transcendence and Buddhist emptiness, it is shown that Nietzsche's crisis thinking is not limited to European modernity but is connected to civilizational and universal existential questions. Ultimately, the paper concludes that Nietzsche's philosophy is not an elegy for the decline of modernity, but a philosophical project of creating new values through crisis, which remains relevant today for understanding the global moral and cultural crises of the twenty-first century. Friedrich Nietzsche is considered a critic of religion, civilization, modernity, and morality, while also being a fundamental theorist of the crisis of modern civilization. Nietzsche's philosophy is not merely a critique of morality or religion, but a philosophical analysis of the disintegration of the entire value structure of modernity. Through concepts such as "the death of God," "nihilism," "slave morality," and "will to power," Nietzsche diagnoses the moral, religious, and existential crisis pervading modern European consciousness. For Nietzsche, this crisis is not an accidental historical failure, but an inevitable stage of value transformation. Through his genealogical method, Nietzsche demonstrates that modern civilization and its devalued morality have become life-destroying rather than life-affirming, resulting in nihilism becoming the fundamental malady of modern civilization. The concepts of the Will to Power and the Übermensch guide this crisis not towards passive decline, but towards active self-realization and value creation. A comparison of Nietzsche with Heidegger and Foucault reveals that while Heidegger analyzes the modern crisis as the forgetting of Being and Foucault as the institutional structure of power-knowledge, Nietzsche views the crisis as a problem of the decline of values. Furthermore, a comparative dialogue with Indian philosophy, particularly the Upanishadic concept of self-realization and the Buddhist Nagarjunian concept of emptiness, clarifies that Nietzsche's crisis-oriented thinking is not limited to European modernity, but is connected to civilizational and universal existential questions. Ultimately, Nietzsche's philosophy is not an elegy for the decline of modernity, but a philosophical project of creative value creation through crisis, which remains relevant today for understanding the global moral and cultural crises of the twenty-first century.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dr. Shakeel Husain
Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dr. Shakeel Husain (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ca1369883daed6ee0954d1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19281138