Comparing relations between latent constructs across groups is essential for understanding social phenomena in different contexts. A key assumption for valid comparisons of such relations is that the constructs are measured equivalently across the groups, referred to as “measurement invariance”. Specifically, partial metric invariance is sufficient – meaning that at least some factor loadings are invariant across groups – provided that non-invariant measurement parameters are appropriately accounted for in the model. To address this, we propose double-mixture multigroup structural equation modeling (2MixMG-SEM), which applies a mixture clustering of the groups to capture differences in the measurement model (measurement clusters) and another mixture clustering to capture differences in the structural relations (structural relations clusters). 2MixMG-SEM thus captures measurement non-invariance with cluster-specific measurement parameters, as opposed to mixture multigroup SEM (MixMG-SEM), which captures them with group-specific parameters. We therefore expect 2MixMG-SEM to perform better than MixMG-SEM when some groups are too small for group-specific parameters to be (accurately) estimated. Through a simulation study, we evaluate 2MixMG-SEM’s performance, and how ignoring measurement non-invariance affects the recovery of (the clustering on) structural relations.
Zhao et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: