Background and IntroductionBefore the emergence of the new constitution in 1997, Thailand had a weak local government.Its weakness was principally reflected in local government's few responsibilities and obligations, low revenues, state-dominated internal structure and insufficient staff.Local government in every form -Provincial Administrative Organisation (hereinafter "PAO"), Municipality, Sanitary District, Tambon Administrative Organisation ("TAO), City of Pattaya or even Bangkok Metropolitan Administration ("BMA") 1 -was given few responsibilities, by the central government, for providing some simple public services such as garbage collection, waste disposal, road and waterway maintenance and market management.Most of important public services in localities such as those related to universities, hospitals, high ways and airports were provided by central government agencies, either ministries, departments or state enterprises.Financially, local government was granted by central government the authority to levy limited categories of taxes and duties, most of which are the property taxe, local maintenance tax, commercial plate tax and livestock slaughter duty.Furthermore, before the fiscal year of 2001, all local government units in the country were annually allocated by central government only 10 percent of total state revenues.
Somtob et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: