The black hole information paradox is standardly formulated as a conflict among three premises: (P1) unitarity of quantum evolution, (P2) singularity and horizon formation in general relativity, and (P3) thermality of Hawking radiation. This paper subjects the paradox to a structural audit within the framework of Sequential Time Theory–Critical Review (STT-CR). Representing each contributing theory in the canonical form T := ⟨Θsys, P, C, D⟩, we identify the hidden structural defect: the three premises presuppose a single global time parameter t that spans the entire evaporation process, yet this parameter is metrologically non-constructible under STT premises. The event horizon marks a boundary where, for the asymptotic observational protocol under audit, the calibration map between the external observer’s clock and local event generation fails to close; the Planck regime marks the domain where the fundamental unit process ΔQunit itself becomes non-constructible. We argue that the “information loss” is not a physical defect but a protocol defect arising from the breakdown of inter-domain calibration. The paradox does not require resolution; it dissolves once the metrological conditions for stating it are made explicit. Constructive consequences include the protocol-dependence of Hawking radiation thermality and domain-restricted unitarity, and the STT completion program motivates empirically discriminable expectations concerning spectral deviations linked to finite clock resolution.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Teruhito Kojima
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Teruhito Kojima (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5d1f5a333a821460acc3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19345481