The compatibility of the activities of allied actors is essential for NATO’s collective defence. But theoretical and practical discussions regarding interoperability remain largely confined to the military-to-military framework, focusing on the development of effective military activity. Such an approach often treats a crisis or conflict as if it occurs in a vacuum, isolated from other actors and their respective tasks. By analyzing Finnish national reports on the Afghanistan operation, this study provides a holistic view of interoperability. In this broader context, interoperability is presented as an intertwined phenomenon that combines multidirectional dimensions (military-to-military, non-military-to-military, political-to-coalition, and political-to-military) with multilevel dimensions (operational, strategic, and political). This perspective highlights the need for a deeper understanding of multidimensional coordination and cooperation to effectively respond to a wider spectrum of threat.
Soili Paananen (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: