This study examines the methodological structure, benefits, and challenges of thematic analysis through a comparative exploration of three case studies. Guided by three research questions, the study first clarifies the fundamental steps of thematic analysis, highlighting their importance for rigor and transparency in qualitative research. It then identifies the main advantages of this approach, including its flexibility, capacity to organize large volumes of data, ability to detect recurring patterns, and contribution to generating meaningful and theoretically grounded insights. The study also addresses key challenges, such as coding subjectivity, ambiguity in theme definition, and the risk of oversimplifying complex data, emphasizing the need for reflexivity, systematic documentation, and iterative theme review to ensure validity and reliability. Integrating theoretical perspectives with practical examples from multiple case studies demonstrates that thematic analysis remains a robust and adaptable methodological tool across diverse research contexts. This integrative approach highlights the method’s capacity to generate rich, nuanced insights while maintaining analytical rigor.
F. Almeida (Wed,) studied this question.