The incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into judicial systems signifies a fundamental transformation in the delivery of justice. Although AI offers efficiency, consistency, and predictive powers, human intelligence includes ethical discernment, empathy, and complex reasoning that machines find challenging to emulate. This study analyzes the comparative functions of artificial intelligence and human cognition within legal frameworks, the prospects for AI-enhanced decision-making, the issues associated with ethical and legal accountability, and the ramifications for judicial procedures. This study seeks to establish a framework for aligning AI tools with human-centered legal thinking through the analysis of case studies, technology frameworks, and jurisprudential ideas.
Jubaer Shah (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: