Suicide is a major global public health concern, particularly among university students, who exhibit higher rates than their non-student peers. Although gender disparities in suicide rates are well documented, the underlying network structure of suicidal tendencies and comorbid psychological symptoms across genders remains insufficiently understood. Psychometric network analysis was conducted to examine the interrelations between suicidal tendencies and core psychological symptoms among 1,021 vocational college students (488 males, 533 females). Gaussian Graphical Models were estimated using the EBICglasso method to identify central and bridge nodes, and Network Comparison Tests were used to evaluate gender differences in network structure, global metrics, and edge weights. Gender-specific networks revealed distinct patterns. Suicidal preparation emerged as a highly central symptom and stronger bridge node among females, whereas hopelessness was a key bridge factor among males. Global strength (p = 0.131) did not differ significantly between genders, whereas global expected influence (p = 0.007) showed significant gender differences. Several nodes and edges also demonstrated gender-specific patterns. Depression emerged as a pivotal core symptom, and suicidal preparation acted as a crucial bridge linking psychological symptoms to suicide risk among vocational college students. Significant gender differences were observed in symptom centrality, bridge functions, and specific symptom–symptom interactions. Females appeared more vulnerable through pathways involving suicidal preparation, whereas males were more affected by hopelessness. These findings underscore the need for gender-tailored suicide prevention strategies targeting these distinct network mechanisms.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mingfa Wu
Hui Wang
Ming Li
BMC Psychology
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
Hainan Medical University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5f005a333a821460dbf3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04428-2