The proliferation of autonomous AI agents has exposed critical security gaps, from tool poisoning to supply chain attacks, as exemplified by CVE-2026-25253. This paper traces the evolution of the Agent Security Harness, an open-source adversarial testing framework, from its initial 209 tests to a community-enhanced suite of 342 tests, culminating in a perfect 10/10 evaluation score. We detail the challenges of integrating community plugins, which initially dropped the score to 6.5/10, and the subsequent recovery through manifest-based integrity checks, trust tiers, and hardening protocols. Building on our prior work in Decision Load Index (DLI) and Constitutional Self-Governance (CSG), we propose a sustainable model for open contributions, including bounties and good-first issues. The framework's journey demonstrates how collaborative red-teaming can mitigate agent risks, aligning with AIUC-1 standards and offering a blueprint for enterprise-grade security. We outline the v4.0 roadmap and invite further participation to foster a robust, collective defense against emerging threats.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Michael Saleme
Cognitive Research (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Michael Saleme (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5f645a333a821460e7ba — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19343107
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: