The U-Cell Model (UCM) predicts isothermal dark matter halo profiles ρ ∝ r⁻² from its substrate action. We compare three UCM predictions against eROSITA All-Sky Survey galaxy cluster data. First, for gas in hydrostatic equilibrium in an isothermal potential, the UCM predicts a Cavaliere–Fusco-Femiano beta parameter βUCM = μ mₚ vflat²/ (3 kB T) ≈ 0. 5–0. 7 for typical cluster temperatures and velocity dispersions, consistent with the empirically measured range β ≈ 0. 55–0. 75 from eROSITA and XMM-Newton profiles. Second, the UCM acceleration scale g† = fcold⁴ c H₀ = 1. 207×10⁻¹⁰ m/s² predicts that the MDAR transition occurs at r ~ 0. 3–0. 5 Mpc in σ ~ 800 km/s clusters — the precise regime probed by Li et al. (2024) for 22 eROSITA clusters. Third, the UCM isothermal envelope extends to rᵥirial ≈ 8. 02 × r₂00; Lyskova et al. (2023) detect stacked emission to 2×r₂00, consistent with the inner 25% of the UCM envelope. Crucially, while MOND fails at cluster scales by a factor 2–4 (no dark matter), the UCM has no such problem: it produces the same MDAR transition as observed in galaxies while simultaneously providing the substrate dark matter needed for cluster masses — unifying MOND's galactic successes with ΛCDM's cluster successes in a single parameter-free framework. The steeper-than-self-similar LX–T relation from 3061 eROSITA clusters (Ramos-Ceja et al. 2025) is attributable to AGN feedback on top of the UCM isothermal gravitational background. The temperature profile is predicted to be flat at intermediate radii (0. 2 r₅00 < r < 0. 8 r₅00), with a mandatory decline toward r₂00 due to accretion shocks.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Norbert Prebeck
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Norbert Prebeck (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0af52659487ece0fa5380 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19390833