This essay presents a critical evaluation of the report The UNGASS Decade in Review (IDPC, 2026), focusing on the relationship between structural ambition and empirical support in civil society advocacy within global drug policy. Using OECD-DAC evaluation criteria, UNEG standards, and realist evaluation approaches, the analysis examines the coherence between acknowledged methodological limitations and the strength of the conclusions presented. The essay identifies a tension between explicitly recognized evidence gaps and the formulation of systemic claims, conceptualized as inferential fragility. It contributes to debates on epistemic responsibility, methodological rigor, and the legitimacy of knowledge production in multilateral policy processes.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Martin Ignacio Díaz Velásquez
Oscar Hugo Espin García
Andrés Manuel Pérez Acosta
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Universidad del Rosario
European Institute for Multidisciplinary Studies on Human Rights and Science - Knowmad Institut
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Velásquez et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0af9a659487ece0fa5a6e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19219584