Abstract Background: Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) assessment via circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers superior sensitivity over imaging for relapse detection and monitoring. In breast cancer, MRD identifies molecular relapse with a median 8.9-month lead time from prior studies, serving as an independent prognostic and potential predictive marker for outcome and therapy escalation. Methods: A systematic ClinicalTrials.gov search (July 2025) yielded 133 trials; 124 met inclusion. Studies were stratified by endpoint hierarchy (primary vs. secondary), status, and methodology (tumor-informed, panel-based, methylation, or CTC/protein/tissue). Results: Among 124 trials, MRD was primary endpoint in 56 (45%) and secondary in 66 (53%). Only 4 primary-endpoint trials have published results, while 52 are ongoing. Tumor-informed/patient-specific assays were the dominant modality (38%), followed by CTC/tissue (20%), fixed panels (17%), and methylation (7%); 18% were unreported. Published clinical utility (primary-endpoint trials). In metastatic guidance (NCT05079074), 85% of patients had baseline ctDNA positivity, and those receiving druggable mutation-guided therapy achieved improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus physician’s choice (HR 0.45). In a prognostication cohort (NCT03792529), genomic profiling identified frequent TP53 (44%), PIK3CA (28.4%), and ERBB2 (24.8%) alterations; high ctDNA fraction and blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB) predicted shorter PFS in TNBC and HER2+ subtypes. In the relapse-prediction setting (NCT02797652), baseline ctDNA was detected in ∼70% (21/30) of operable patients; post-operative ctDNA positivity was 100% predictive of distant metastasis, yielding 71.4% sensitivity for clinical relapses. In an early-detection setting (NCT05227261), among 9,024 individuals screened (0.48% positive), a multi-cancer test demonstrated 99.71% specificity, 70.83% sensitivity, 39.53% positive predictive value, and 99.92% negative predictive value. Monitoring and MRD-adaptive strategies. Serial ctDNA clearance in immunotherapy trials (e.g., NCT02644369) tracked survival, with 100% of patients achieving clearance remaining alive at a median 25-month follow-up. Active MRD-adaptive investigations now deploy randomization to escalation at molecular relapses (e.g., DARE/NCT04567420), single-arm escalation in MRD-positive HER2+ disease (e.g., NCT05388149), and clearance-based de-escalation (e.g., NCT06970912). Conclusions: ctDNA-MRD integration in breast cancer trials is expanding rapidly, shifting to tumor-informed assays. Published data validate ctDNA as a potent prognostic tool (71.4% relapse sensitivity) and predictive biomarker (HR 0.45 intervention benefit). As evidence matures with ongoing randomized trials, assay standardization and actionability remains critical for clinical translation. Citation Format: Momo Arai, Alaa Khalilaa, Ahmed Elkhanany. Real-world landscape analysis of circulating tumor DNA minimal residual disease as a clinical trial endpoint in breast cancer abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 7849.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
M. Arai
Alaa Khalilaa
Ahmed Elkhanany
Cancer Research
Baylor College of Medicine
Alfaisal University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Arai et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fc8ea79560c99a0a2224 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-7849