The atom is conventionally described as a nucleus of protons and neutrons surrounded by electrons in orbitals. This picture rests on a deep ontological asymmetry: electrons are treated as quantum waves (orbitals) stabilised by quantisation, while nucleons are treated as quasi-classical particles held together by a separately postulated strong force. We argue that this asymmetry is historical, not necessary. We propose that both the electronic cloud and the nucleus are quantum collective states—the superelectron and the supernucleus—whose stability arises from geometric constraints expressed by the Gradient Indeterminacy (I-G) principle 1. In this view, the atom is a compound of two collectives, each governed by its own I-G relation and jointly constrained by a coupling indeterminacy that encodes their mutual coherence. This framework eliminates the need for a separate strong force, derives nuclear and atomic stability from shared geometric principles, and generates falsifiable predictions regarding isotope-dependent binding energies and nuclear decay rates. Specifically, we derive a joint constraint of the form -a (N) (ₑ) (VN Vₑ / RN³ a₀³) ^1/2 (/2) \, F₍₄, where F₍₄ is a dimensionless geometric coupling factor that encodes nuclear deformation, orbital penetration, and orientational symmetry.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Daniel Avilés Hurtado
Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Daniel Avilés Hurtado (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fdb0a79560c99a0a3d55 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19410685