La Profilée - Structural Decision: Intervention Is Determined, Not Chosen

La Profilée’s intervention logic (Paper 67) establishes that overload IR > 1 requires two-phase control: stabilization (ΔR) followed by restitution (ΔI, ΔF, ΔC). What Paper 67 does not fully develop is the question of how intervention targets are determined. The present paper establishes that this question has a structural answer: intervention targets are not chosen. They are determined by three structural conditions that jointly specify the uniquely correct intervention at every stage of overload. First, immediate necessity: when IR > 1, ΔR is the only intervention that acts without structural delay. Any intervention other than ΔR leaves IR > 1 in the short term, allowing continued structural erosion during Tᵥisible. This is not a preference — it is a structural constraint. Second, sequential dependency: within Phase 2, the restitution order ΔI → ΔC → ΔF is not a recommended sequence but the only structurally effective one. ΔC is effective only if I is sufficient. ΔF is effective only if C is sufficient. The sequence is a dependency chain, not a strategy. Third, bottleneck dominance: IK = F · I · C is multiplicative. No factor compensates for another. The smallest effective factor in the product determines the binding constraint, and only intervention on the binding constraint increases IK. Intervention on non-binding constraints is structurally wasted. Together these three conditions constitute the Structural Decision Theorem: given LP’s architecture, the correct intervention at any point is uniquely determined by the system’s structural state. There is no freedom of choice in structural intervention. Only misdiagnosis.