Abstract Glioma stem cells (GSCs) are considered a major driver of glioblastoma (GBM) progression and are highly resistant to standard cytotoxic treatments. BMP4 has been shown to promote GSC differentiation, enhance radiosensitivity, slow tumor growth, and extend survival in animal models. Despite this promise, BMP4 has yet to achieve clinical impact, owing largely to heterogeneous and nonlinear responses across preclinical experimental systems. To elucidate how BMP4 could function as an effective targeted differentiation therapy in GBM, we develop a mathematical model that describes the growth of a GBM tumor via a hierarchy of GSCs, progenitor and terminally differentiated cells. We parameterize our model using new radiotherapy and proliferation assay data (with and without BMP4 exposure) from twelve patient-derived GSC lines. This integration of model and data allows us, for the first time, to quantitatively capture patient-specific heterogeneity in BMP4 sensitivity. We perform global sensitivity analysis on the model, identifying proliferation rate and GSC self-renewal sensitivity as key determinants of BMP4 efficacy. These parameters act as model-derived biomarkers that distinguish BMP4-responsive tumors from non-responsive ones. In an in silico analysis across a broad cohort of virtual patients, we find that continuous BMP4 delivery from surgical resection through radiotherapy consistently outperforms a single-dose strategy. Virtual clinical trials further show that, without stratification using these model-derived biomarkers, BMP4 yields little observable therapeutic benefit. In contrast, selecting patients with more proliferative, BMP4-responsive GSCs markedly increases the likelihood of observing a significant treatment effect. Citation Format: Nicholas Harbour, Lee Curtin, Loizos Michaelides, Matthew E. Hubbard, Pamela Jackson, Vinitha Rani, Rajappa Kenchappa, Virginea Farias, Anna Carrano, Markus Owen, Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa, Kristin Swanson. Virtual clinical trials of BMP4 differentiation therapy abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 6831.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nicholas Harbour
Lee Curtin
Loizos Michaelides
Cancer Research
University of Nottingham
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Mayo Clinic in Florida
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Harbour et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fe68a79560c99a0a4ba6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-6831