ABSTRACT Aim This study aimed to review the clinical experiences of British‐born South Asian individuals in psychodynamic therapy, with a particular focus on cultural adaptation and integration. The goal was to develop recommendations for integrating clients' cultural frames of reference into therapeutic work in order to enhance its effectiveness. British‐born South Asians often experience conflicting British and South Asian values, which can lead to feelings of alienation, confusion, and intergenerational conflict. The study therefore explored acculturation, the tension between individualism and collectivism, and the psychodynamic implications of holding two contrasting cultural value systems within the self. Method Semi‐structured, one‐on‐one interviews were conducted via Zoom, allowing participants to reflect on their experiences in a familiar and accessible environment. Data were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), which enabled a detailed exploration of participants' subjective experiences and the meanings they attributed to their cultural and therapeutic journeys. Findings Two major themes emerged: (1) culture, and (2) the process of change. Participants described an ongoing struggle to form a cohesive cultural identity and to renegotiate the blend of Indian and British values in ways that felt authentic. Psychodynamic therapy supported participants in gaining autonomy and exploring aspects of the “self” within a non‐judgmental and containing space. The therapeutic relationship played a central role in facilitating this process, with participants emphasising the importance of a culturally attuned therapist who could hold the complexities of dual identity, without imposing assumptions or judgement. Conclusions Participants' upbringing significantly influenced their relationships, identity, and capacity for autonomy. Although autonomy was eventually achieved, the tension between the contrasting cultural expectations of British and Indian heritage persisted throughout their lives. These findings highlight the importance of understanding this dual‐cultural pressure within psychodynamic therapy, particularly in relation to internal conflict, guilt, and the negotiation of selfhood across differing cultural value systems. Recommendations Clinicians should adopt a philosophical and culturally attuned approach, incorporating an understanding of the client's unique experience of individualism and collectivism. Training should focus on attunement to the distinct moral frameworks present in clients navigating these dual identities.
Patel et al. (Fri,) studied this question.