This essay argues that alignment in human–AI interaction is not a stable property of models but a dynamically unstable process shaped by interaction. In extended interactions, systems tend to exhibit drift: gradual shifts in definitions, constraints, and conceptual boundaries that remain locally coherent while undermining global consistency. The essay introduces a distinction between local and global coherence and suggests that current alignment approaches primarily optimize for the former while neglecting long-term structural stability. It proposes a shift in perspective from controlling outputs to stabilizing interaction, emphasizing boundary maintenance, drift detection, and structural restoration as emerging requirements for reliable human–AI collaboration.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Thomas A. Blüm
Human Computer Interaction (Switzerland)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Thomas A. Blüm (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d34e3e9c07852e0af97d66 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19422923
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: